Hi Yasemin,
your post sent me 3 days back in time - and made me doing my first steps and evaluations again.
I am absolutely sure that I checked out exactly the option you mentioned a few days ago.
But I failed and did not get the hoped result.
This time - after you motivated me to check that again, it worked.
Seems as if I'd done something wrong on monday.
The mentioned aproach seems to work even with the double-jump I need:
- Jump from QueryA to QueryC
'A' containts 0notificatn, 'C' doesn't, and needs to be filtered refering to 0doc_number
'C' contains a replacement-path variable for 0doc_number using Query 'B'
'B' is a 'mapping query', based on an DSO, containing relation 0notifcatn <-> 0docnumber
and it contains a replacement-path variabe for 0notification using Query 'A'
When the jump is triggered, Query A passes all Variables to Query 'C' (using 'B' (using 'A2'))).
Query A2 is the same as A and is restricted as A was at the moment of jumping. A2 passes
the referred 0notificatn-values to 'B', which passes the referred 0doc_numbers to Query 'C'. Voila, there we are.
I'll keep on evaluating this - but it seems that you showed me the track to the holy grail of my working-day. Thanks a lot.